This is a question that has
been debated over the eons and is still a matter of debate. Will it be settled
one way or the other? Let us see if that is possible at all!
Peter Drucker, the famous
management Guru said, “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.” Very
true. Similarly, unless you clearly define a thing, its existence or otherwise
cannot be established. So, the first thing to be done is to define what we seek
to establish.
Can GOD be defined?
There have been many definitions
of GOD. Starting from worshipping nature and thus defining GOD to natural
elements, more sophisticated definitions of GOD have been postulated over the
millennia. But, in my opinion, none can put the definition of GOD so succinctly
and in an unequivocal and sublime manner as Vedanta, the philosophical portion
of Sanatana Dharma. Vedanta calls GOD as “Brahman” – which means one
that expands without limit. In English you can call it “The Vast” without any
qualification – like a vast universe etc., It literally means “Infinite”
The next question is “what
is the definition of Brahman?”
Taitriya Upanishad (2.1.1) defines
Brahman thus: “Sathyam Jnanam Anantham Brahma.”
That is, Brahman is Satyam,
Brahman is Jnanam and Brahman is Anantham.
Just as you need to unzip a
file to know its contents, the above statement needs to be unzipped to get a
clear understanding of the definition of Brahman.
Let us start with the word Anantham.
It is a Sanskrit word that means unlimited or infinite. When something is said
to be unlimited, what are the factors that could limit such a thing? As per
Vedanta, three things can limit an entity from being unlimited. They are
Desha –
space; Kaala – Time; Vastu – Object
Let us see one by one. An
object is limited by space if it has definite boundaries in space and cannot be
at two places at the same time. For example, I am currently in my living room
and hence I am not in my bedroom. I am therefore limited by space. Brahman is
not limited by space by definition and hence Brahman is omnipresent – sarva
vyapi in Sanskrit.
Similarly, I am limited by
time, meaning my body never existed before it was born and will not exist after
it dies. Hence my body is limited by time. Vedanta says Brahman is not limited
by time meaning there was no time when Brahman was not there and there will be
no time when Brahman will not be there. Hence Brahman is beyond time and is
eternal – Nithyam in Sanskrit.
The third limitation is a
slightly abstruse concept called the law of identity. For example, the pen I
hold can only be a pen and not a pencil. An object can only be itself and not
any other entity. That is why we have an
Aadhar card and I am identified by it and no one else is me! Vedanta states
that Brahman has no object limitation meaning that nothing is different from
Brahman – that is, there cannot be even one entity apart from it. In other
words, there is ONLY Brahman and nothing else. It is called non-dual – Advaita
in Sanskrit.
The definition seems to be a
brilliant one but is it an esoteric abstract philosophical construct or is it
something real? If it is real, then obviously, Brahman must be present in the
here and now and in every object that was, is and will be. The beauty of
Vedanta is that it is not a belief system but one that should be validated and
experienced. Hence, we need to test this hypothesis before we accept it.
But before that, first two
words also need to be explored. The word Satyam means real. To test this
against the definition we just discussed, let us take a real object – say a Pen.
Will it transcend the limitations of Space, Time, and Object? All three tests
will fail because a Pen cannot be here and there also, it was not there before
it was manufactured and will cease to exist once it is destroyed and it is only
a pen and not anything else. Thus, if we stick to Satyam’s original meaning
”real,” it contradicts the earlier definition of Brahman. In such cases of
contradiction, Sastras prescribe that the implied meaning of a word must be
taken.
In the same example, the Pen
exists, laptop exists, you exist, I exist etc., Every known object exists. The
underlying common factor in all these objects is Existence. So, if we
were to take the implied meaning of Satyam as Existence, then the
earlier contradiction will not be there. If you take any object in the entire
universe, it exists and Existence is the underlying principle. The
objects themselves may have various shapes, forms, and functions, but they all
exist. So, if we take Existence principle as Satyam, it will
clearly be congruent with our definition of Brahman as Anantham. Existence
is not limited by space, time, and object. Even if all the objects in the
universe are destroyed, for argument’s sake, Existence continues in the
unmanifest state but will be manifest only through objects that we can
perceive. It is like the ocean and the waves, with the ocean being the Existence
and the waves of different heights and forms being the objects. The ocean
exists even if all the waves die down.
Now, let us take the second
word Jnanam. The direct meaning of this word is “knowledge.” It is obvious
it will fail the test of Anantham just as the direct meaning of the word
Sathyam did. I do not have the knowledge that you have, like for example, you
may have knowledge in Sanskrit but I do not! Hence extending the same arguments
that we put forth for Sathyam, if we take the implied meaning of Jnanam, ie.
awareness or consciousness, then it will pass the test of Anantham easily.
Pure consciousness or awareness, called Chit in Sanskrit, is not limited
by space, time, or objects. All knowledge and all our experiences happen in
awareness. And like existence, awareness is the underlying principle because of
which we experience the entire universe.
Hence Brahman is Sathyam,
Jnanam, Anantham or Sat, Chit, Anantham meaning Existence, Awareness,
Infinite. It is self-consistent without any contradictions. We can test
this definition against anything in this universe and it will be valid!
Now, that the definition of
GOD has been clearly established, let us come back to the original question, “Does
God Exist?” I shall rephrase the question and ask you “Do you Exist?” Your
answer to this question is the answer to the former as well. Vedanta goes one
step further and states that there is ONLY Brahman and nothing else and emphatically
states “Tat Tvam Asi” meaning you are verily that Brahman – That Thou Art.