I had never seen my father
shed tears as a young boy. One day I was surprised to see that. A gentle
enquiry revealed that one Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru had died and that he was the Prime
Minister of India. It was in May 1964 and I was about 10 years old. The papers
carried extensive photographs the next day with large crowds mourning the death
of Pandit ji. I also vaguely remember discussions earlier about the Indo-China
war with our boarding school notice board displaying the “McMohan line”. He was
a cult figure those days with people like my dad revering him for his work
during the freedom movement. I am sure they were also aware of the scandals
surrounding Mr. Nehru but the perception that he was an intellectual known for his
erudition and international standing perhaps overshadowed this downside. “Who
after Nehru?” seemed to be the question on everyone’s lips. I don’t remember
much about his era as the PM though.
After a “night watchman”
Mr. Gulzarilal Nanda’s short tenure, Mr. Lal Bahadur Shastri became the PM,
thanks to Mr. Kamaraj, the king maker, those days. What a stalwart Mr. Kamaraj
was! I can only laugh at the pygmies who call themselves leaders in TN today,
who do not command even a semblance of respect from the masses now! The
diminutive Mr. Shastri was very popular those days belying his humble background
and was a total contrast to the glamourous Pandit ji. I remember the 1965 war
with Pakistan very well and Mr. Shastri’s slogan ”Jai Jawan Jai Kisan”
reverberated throughout the country. I vividly recall that we skipped our
dinner on Monday in our boarding school in response to the clarion call of
beloved Shastri ji. Pakistan was given a sound thrashing and Shastri ji went to
Tashkent in January 1966 to sign a peace agreement with General Ayub Khan never
to return. His untimely death was an unfortunate moment in our history for Shastri ji impressed one
and all during his short stint as a man known for his simplicity, practicality
and one who would steer the nation with grit and integrity. Alas, it was not to
be!
Mrs. Indira Gandhi, the
petite I&B minister in Shastri ji’s cabinet was catapulted to the PM’s post
after Shastri ji’s demise once again by Mr. Kamaraj ahead of Mr. Morarji Desai who
was the more senior parliamentarian. In her first term from 67-71, Indira ji,
courted controversy several times like supporting Mr. V V Giri ahead of Mr. Sanjiva
Reddy , the official congress candidate for Presidency, split the congress
after she was expelled, abolished privy purses and nationalised private banks. These decisions had far reaching consequences on the history and
progress of our country. After the glorious victory liberating Bangladesh in
1971, Mrs. Gandhi’s rule was marked by her declaration of emergency in defiance
of Allahabad High Court orders invalidating her election. There was a virtual
dictatorship in the country between 75 and 77. This was the time when I joined
a Bank in Uttar Pradesh as a probationary officer! If UP was like what I saw
during emergency, GOD help them in other times, was my feeling. Her son Sanjay
Gandhi was ruling the roost with extra constitutional authority. Forced
sterilisations and grazing unauthorized constructions through brute force were
the order of the day. Those who are crying hoarse today that we are facing a
fascist government and an authoritarian PM have not seen what emergency was,
obviously. News was censored, and anyone with even a whimper of criticism was
put behind bars. I remember seeing Tughlaq magazine with a black front page in
protest. Most of the opposition, irrespective of age, were behind bars. A number
of leaders were in hiding fearing imminent arrest. Elections were postponed and
opposition ruled states were dismissed using Article 356. It was during the
first tenure that the Nagarwala bank case became a talk of the town. Compared
to today’s scam’s it was a pittance – only about 60 Lakhs!
In the meantime all
opposition had come together under Sri. Jayaprakash Narayan. The Janata party
was born with parties of all denominations being a part of it. In 1977, Mrs.
Gandhi called for elections, presumably under the false impression that her
popularity was intact – perhaps based on intelligence reports! Congress lost
miserably and Janata party came to power. The next three years saw the
coalition tamasha with Mr. Morarji Desai and Mr. Charan Singh taking positions of power
as PM. While Mr. Morarji was a seasoned politician with extensive administrative
experience, Mr. Charan Singh had no such credentials. There was an open lust for
power with the result that the government collapsed under its own contradictions. This
should definitely be a lesson for today’s youngsters if they think an alliance
of parties without any ideological congruence can come together and provide a
stable government!
Mrs. Gandhi came back to
power for the third term in 1980, thanks to the folly of Mr. Charan Singh who had her and her son Sanjay arrested. Such acts whip up frenzy in India and the
result was a foregone conclusion. Mrs. Gandhi, during these years in power tried
to meddle with the Akali politics in Punjab – supporting Bhindranwale initially
and later he became a separatist fighting for Khalistan and took to arms. Mrs. Gandhi ordered
operation “Blue Star” in which the army entered the Golden Temple complex and
killed not only Bhindranwale but a number of innocent pilgrims besides damaging
the Golden Temple Complex. Three months later, her own Sikh bodyguards
assassinated her in her residence. This again was a tragic moment in our history.
If I were to look at the
prevailing political culture in this country and trace its roots, it would
certainly point to Mrs. Gandhi. She was charismatic yet ruthless. She had her
way. She brooked no opposition to her views. She roughshod over all
institutions and threw away all conventions to the wind. It was during her time
that the President’s office earned the ignominious nickname ‘Rubber Stamp’. Sycophancy
was the norm and entire establishment was servile to her. She never allowed her
regional heads to build a following of their own and ruthlessly decimated such
persons if ever she felt that someone was remotely a threat to her. The coterie
in Delhi started to build and the party was full of such sycophants who had no
standing of their own. She is the mother of all present rhetoric and sloganeering that you see today – “Garibi Hatao” being her famous tagline. And not to be
outdone, one of her sycophants had the temerity to coin the slogan “Indira is
India and India is Indira!”
What followed her death was even more brutal and a blot on a country like India when thousands of Sikhs
were murdered in broad daylight with the Delhi police twiddling their thumbs!
It was one of the saddest days in my memory, for Sikhs are great people who
have given only the best for this country. I have had many interactions with
Sardars and they are the most helpful, hospitable and patriotic citizens you
can see. During all these years, while I was not actively involved in politics,
I always used to hear my father admonish and lambast Mrs. Gandhi almost on a
daily basis! In Mrs. Gandhi era, my father had slowly moved towards Rajaji’s
Swatantra party and was a patron of their Swarajya magazine.
If at all an opportunity
presented itself to the Congress party to redeem itself and become a democratic
one that they professed, that was the time. But alas, it was not to be. And we
are now saddled with a dynastic party with that single decision. Buta Singh and
President Zail Singh persuaded Mr. Rajiv Gandhi, Mrs. Gandhi’s son, to
become the Prime minister. The seeds for a dynastic succession were thus sown.
It may be argued that Mrs. Gandhi succeeded her father. But it must be
remembered she was a minister in Shastri ji’s cabinet and was propelled to this
role by Mr. Kamaraj and his friends! And Rajiv was not even in active politics
being an airline pilot!
Rajiv, as a person was
very suave, dignified and spoke well. He was liked by the masses and in
his initial years, he appeared to be earnest in revamping the party and
government. It was he who brought in a change of mindset relating to computers
and telecommunication. In all fairness, he was the forerunner to what we
acclaim as digital India today. People like me moved from traditional banking
to IT, thanks to his policies. IT industry was reborn in India, so to speak,
after IBM were all driven out of India during the Janata regime. He had his own
pitfalls like decision on Shah Bano case which is talked about even today.
However, what led to his downfall was the alleged bribery scandal in the Bofors
and HDW deal. Ms. Chitra Subramanian of “The Hindu” – a paper which was highly
respected then and people swore by its contents - exposed the money trail
leading ultimately to the late Quattrochi. Mr. V P Singh, a minister and friend of
Rajiv, resigned and was at the forefront of this agitation against the
government. The slogan “Gali gali me Shor hai, Rajiv Gandhi chor hai!” could be
heard all over India. Compared to today’s scandals, Bofors was a pittance
though. In the 1989 elections that followed, Mr. V P Singh under the Janata Dal
banner, despite being in minority, with outside support became the PM.
Mr. V P Singh’s tenure (89-90)
was very short and less than a year. All that I remember of his tenure was his
implementation of Mandal Commission recommendations leading to protests all
over the country! He was a champion of social justice and had admirers in a
number of opposition camps. That legacy continues to this day, especially in TN. This was also the time when Mr. L K Advani started his
famous rath yatra and the Ram Janmabhoomi issue also came to the fore. BJP
withdrew support to Mr. V P Singh leading to his downfall as he was against this
stand of BJP. Mr. Chandrasekhar, who was also a part of the Janata Dal, formed
his own party Samajwadi Janata party with a few of his followers. Though he was
in minority, he became the PM with Congress support. However, in less than 6
months he had to resign in June 1991, after congress withdrew its support!
We had planned to visit
Kanchipuram early morning the next day via Sriperumbudur in late May 1991. When
we woke up the next day, we heard the tragic news of the assassination of Rajiv
Gandhi in Sriperumbudur while addressing an election meeting. This was in
retaliation to his sending the IPKF – the Indian Peace keeping force – to Sri
Lanka to support their army against the LTTE. The LTTE had planned and executed
the assassination, as the later investigations revealed. This again was a
turning point in our history for had he been alive, what would have transpired
in the forthcoming elections was anyone’s guess. It was a tragic and untimely
death.
With Rajiv’s death, the
sympathy wave worked in favour of the Congress and they were the single largest
party in Lok Sabha. Mr. P V Narasimha Rao was chosen as the PM of the country – a
sort of first outside the Nehru-Gandhi family to rule for a full term of five
years. This was perhaps a watershed moment in our history for he was the
architect of liberalisation of our economy. He had a bureaucrat Dr. Manmohan
Singh as his Finance Minister. He even appointed an opposition leader Mr. Subramaniam Swamy to a cabinet rank post in his ministry. He was erudite, a
Sanskrit scholar and was fluent in 14-15 languages including French, Arabic,
Spanish, German & Persian! One of the blots on his tenure was the
demolition of Babri Masjid leading to animosity between communities which lasts
till today. The dispute still persists with courts unable to decide on this contentious
issue. The saddest part about Mr. Rao, was the ill treatment given to him by
his own party after his death!
In 1996, Congress lost its
majority in Lok Sabha and BJP emerged as the single largest party with
considerably less seats than the halfway mark. As per convention, the President
invited BJP to form the government and Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee took oath as PM.
However, he knew that he could not prove majority on the floor of the house and
resigned after a couple of weeks. United front that was formed with coming
together of non-BJP, non-congress parties staked a claim to form the
Government. Mr. Deve Gowda was their choice of PM for about 11 months, followed
by Mr. I K Gujral for about a year till March 1998. But this United Front
Government could not survive for obvious reasons and fresh elections were held
in 1998. The less we talk about this period, the better!
In the 1998 elections, BJP
was the single largest party but the NDA alliance had seats close the halfway
mark. A NDA Govt was sworn in with Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee as the PM in mid-1998.
However, AIADMK pulled out of the alliance leading to the defeat of the
Government by one vote in mid-1999. During this short tenure, Mr. Vajpayee
initiated the nuclear bomb blast, Lahore visit which was followed by the Kargil
war! The aggressors were shown their place after an initial surprise.
In the 1999 general
elections that followed, NDA won a decisive victory and Mr. Vajpayee was sworn in as the PM for
the third time and this time he had a full run of 5 years. It was during this
tenure that India got a boost to Infrastructure like the golden quadrilateral
etc., The tenure was also marked by some unsavoury incidents like the attack on
Parliament by militants, the Gujarat riots, Kargil Coffin scandal etc. The performance of the
Government from a common man’s perspective was fairly satisfactory and the
slogan “India Shining” was doing the rounds! But in the 2004 General elections,
the NDA could only muster 181 seats against the UPA which got 218 seats. The
BJP and Congress got 138 and 145 seats respectively.
With the UPA being invited
to form Government after much speculation and controversy, it was announced
that the UPA chairperson, Smt. Sonia Gandhi had graciously stepped down from
the leadership position and nominated Mr. Manmohan Singh as the PM. Mr. Singh went
on to win the 2009 elections as well and was the PM for 2 terms spanning 10
years called UPA-1 and UPA-2. They brought in reforms like introduction
of Aadhar, NREGA, RTI act, civil nuclear agreement, right to education,
reservation for OBC in institutes of higher learning like IIT etc., However, it
was also marked by a number of scams like the 2G spectrum, CWG, Coal block
allocation etc., His tenure was also marked by policy paralysis with
accusations that decisions were being taken by a coterie of the Congress chief. The
coalition partners did not make things easier for him as well. Hence despite
being a learned economist, one who was perceived as clean, he was termed as an
“accidental PM”. He was subservient to his Congress chief who was driving the
country by proxy without any accountability. Obviously, in such a setup, a number
of beneficiaries enjoyed the patronage of the ruling class, especially the
Press and the likes in Lutyens Delhi. The only time Mr. Singh asserted himself
was during the civil nuclear deal with US. When the communists threatened to
withdraw support, Mr. Singh put them in their place and went ahead with the
deal. Mr. Singh was a good man but was not a politician! His career as a
bureaucrat was marked by some achievements in the field of economics and is
held in high esteem even today. But, unfortunately as a politician and a leader, he was not
someone who could inspire you. He once said that history will be kinder to him
than media. It remains to be seen but personally I cannot fathom why he
accepted the role of the PM despite knowing what is in store for him. I feel
very sad for such a scholar and upright man.
Mr. Narendra Damodar Das
Modi won the 2014 election convincingly based on the anti-incumbency, the
alleged scams of the previous regime and on the development plank. What he has
done or not done during the past 5 years is too recent to recount and perhaps
each and everyone knows it in great detail. Instead, I will talk about the 2014
election itself.
2014 was the first
election when I was fully involved right from the word go – since announcement
of elections. Perhaps I had lot of time on my hands since I had retired. The
social media made following the happenings a lot easier and faster. There were
constant debates in the 24 hour news channels with their ubiquitous “breaking
news”. I felt that the print media’s relevance was gone. By seeing the author
of an article, you could predict on whose side he /she was – it was all paid or
one sided reporting and writing. Shamelessly they took sides and promoted a
particular party. Gone were the days when as young students we used to look up
to papers like “The Hindu” for authentic news. Columns by writers like G K Reddy
were legendary and we read it just to improve our language skills. And talking
of language, prior to the advent of TV, even reading about cricket in “The Hindu”
by the likes of Jack Fingleton or Nirmal Shekar was a lesson in itself with a
fair amount of literary quotes embellishing the articles! Alas, those days are gone never to return!
Despite all this, I had a
premonition that there might be a change in the political scene in the country.
I read a lot about Mr. Modi, the growth of Gujarat, the Gujarat riots and how
the establishment hounded him for over a decade, how he was portrayed as the
“merchant of death” etc. In him I saw a great orator and a person who could
motivate people. He appeared to be having a vision for the country and
absolutely fearless. His family background was very humble and he did not have
any personal agenda to come to power. The way he campaigned for the party
across the length and breadth of the country was amazing. Perhaps, I saw for
the first time someone of the stature of Mrs. Gandhi in our political
landscape. He was a politician with all boxes ticked. The liberals hated him
for he proudly wore his religion on his sleeve and perceived to be a "Hindutva" proponent. He gave a damn to the so called
“media” who were hell bent on making disparaging comments about his development
model and time and again bringing in the Gujarat riots though the SIT of the
Supreme Court had absolved him of any wrongdoing. And honestly there was no
single person of that stature who could be even compared to him even though he
had no experience leading the country. His victory was momentous for the
nation.
The 2019 elections will be
fought on achievements of the Modi government. While the parties go about their
campaign, there is no single opposition leader of the stature or track record
of Mr. Modi to oppose him. The opposition has no vision or any meaningful
manifesto. Their only agenda seems to be to defeat Mr. Modi! In a country like
India it could still happen – like in 2004 when Vajpayee lost despite the
feeling that India was shining. While I would still respect the verdict of the
people, the loss will be ours as I don’t see anyone with a similar vision and
capability as Mr. Modi on the horizon for now. In my personal view, among the
pantheon of PM’s we have had, only Mrs. Gandhi, warts and all, and Mr. Modi
are leaders in the true sense of the word.
From the above narration,
you can also see what happened when coalition governments came to power in
centre. It was utter disaster and it would be the same again should the smaller
parties manage to win the numbers this time. It would be a travesty of justice
for the millions of people in India who are looking up to leadership at the top
for their wellbeing. Appeasement politics, giving doles are all outdated
policies. Growth, development and improvement in the wellbeing of people, jobs are
the only measures with which people will decide the performance of the
Government.
The Indian voters are not
stupid and am sure they will vote sensibly. But I also believe that elections
are not fought on issues but on emotions. So any leader who captures the
imagination of the people wins! And who else other than Mr. Modi at this point who has captured the imagination of the nation!
This is the first time I am seeing ordinary citizens campaigning for a leader.
That speaks for itself.
May 23rd is the
D-day. Anything can happen in an election, irrespective of what the opinion
polls say. Till then, let us watch all the tamasha unfold. Vote for any candidate
you think is the best, but vote you must. Jai Hind.
Very well articulated sir. Briefly it unfolded the crucial events from 64 era. I really relished the entire blog. Kudos to you sir. As you said in India anything can happen n praying that Modi will prevail upon to lead India. The younger generation need this verdict in order to march forward in right direction
ReplyDeleteJaihind
Murali
Thanks Murali. All we can do is to wait and watch!
DeleteIt was emotional attachment to Nehru for that genration. Every one thought Congress will be same as before independeInd. Nehru did a phenomenal damage. His socialistic policies , management of J and K problem and mismanagement of foreign policy including China are the root cause for today's problem. No need to talk about Indhra. She continued the bad work done by her father. Rajiv was ok. But he got wrong advise on some areas and his wife was behind his downfall. PVN period was better.But greedy Congress leaders ensured his downfall. 'Accidental PM' period was full of scams and some good legislation passed. In the non-Cong government nothing to mention about VP Sing,Gowda and Gujral. Morarji Desai government started good things but power hungry Charan Singh ensured downfall of government. Only BJP government implemented good things and especially Modi is the need of the hour. Hopefully better sense prevail with the voters and elect Modi for one more term
ReplyDeleteWe cannot sweep away all that Nehru or the congress did. Countries that got independence along with India did not go the democratic way. And we can credit Nehru for that largely. Despite her scheming ways, Indira definitely left her mark as a leader. But for PVN's tenure and his liberalisation, none of us would be where we are today. but unfortunately neither the party nor the country has acknowledged that fully! Modi has certainly brought a whiff of fresh air. The jury is out - let us wait and watch!
DeleteNehru was advised by experts on economic policies or other matters. He never heeded to those advices.For example Rajaji advised model which is a traditional Indian style. Not opening up economy. Butsuit to the locallindian situation. But he thought he was born to rule.Though British left Nehru could not leave British thoughts.He insulted Ambedhkar and showed his arrogance. He never heeded advise on China
DeleteAny way it is all opinion. Nothing going to change
Excellent stuff. A trip down the memory lane for all those who have tracked the Indian political scene very closely. I am personally a big fan of Nehru and don’t agree that his policies have created problems post independence. The setting up of higher educational institutions like IIT’s (Temples of modern India, in his own words) have had far reaching impact for the country as a whole. I am still not sure if India and Indian businesses would have survived the onslaught of big multinationals if the gates had been opened immediately after independence. He said “We are prisoners of our age” which reflects his thought process and adduces he probably regretted some of his actions and policy decisions ex post facto. My stance is it is difficult for us to travel back in time and fathom all the ideas that came about in the context of the world political climate during that era. His personal life - the lesser said the better.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely! I agree with you. It is also difficult to judge a decision in hindsight. The current trend thrashing all that Nehru and the congress did is pure hogwash. One cannot separate a decision from the context. And entire India worshipped Mrs. Gandhi and they are doing the same to Modi now - and going overboard as is our wont. We are not able to separate the wheat from the chaff and discuss objectively. Sad but that is how it is.
DeleteDear NSG Sir,
ReplyDeleteI was not even born till Mrs. Gandhi's days. The history in our school days which I vaguely remember is all about Aurangzeb, Akbar and Jahangir's rule.
It's fantastic that you have put together the history of our government right from our independence.
To be honest, until Modi ji as our PM there was no interest to know about politics. But this article widely helps to know the history.
Surprised to see the agenda of the current opposition parties to say their only aim is to defeat Modi speaks itself that they do not have any vision for our nation.
Jai Hind. Let's hope the best for a non-corrupt and sincere man from Gujarat having right direction for our Bharath becomes the PM again.
Bharath Matha ki Jai!!!
Best regards,
Ananth PG
Thanks Ananth. Hope only the best happens to our country.
DeleteGreat narration NSG. You have the history of Indian prime Ministers without any bias. Irrespective of their party, ideology some stands apart due to their performance and involvement. As an economics student, I have great respect for Manmohan but he was allowed to perform on his own. As you rightly pointed out after Indira, only Modi have pan-india image (may be less in some states like TN). Even his enemies cannot fault him on his sincerity and time spared to nation. We do not know how the judgement will be on 23rd.,but he will remain in indian history as a great achiever.
ReplyDeleteThanks Guna. I hope wiser counsels prevail and people choose candidates who can serve this great nation.
DeleteAn interesting chronicle indeed.
ReplyDeleteThe 'MahAgadbandhan' or "opportunistic alliance' is the sad part of the current scenario. Matured voters will avoid this clout duly knowing the fact that it will die faster than its formation - thanks to the rat race among the undeserving leaders of respective regional parties.
NDA with Mr.Modi as the captain, may scarp through for a second term - perhaps sadly by default and not by choice. This is the saddest point though.
About Mr.Modi and his current team and their 'I' innings' governance - are we going to say - 'So far so good' or 'So far not bad'. The mute points are:
1) Whether this team, if voted back, will focus on development without corruption, as they have done so far, or will indulge in complacent acts like a batsmen in the slog overs who will switch over to unfounded ruthless aggression to set a target or meet it.
2) How long BJP can ride on the back of Mr.Modi? Will it scramble in his absence, for any reason whatsoever, like what we are witnessing in AIADMK after the departure of Jayalalitha?
3) Has BJP got plan B / C - already Gadkari ( a good performer though) is hitting the headlines.
4) If family politics of DMK or Congress is deplorable, so will be that of a situation for a party that survives over the charisma of an individual.
End of the day - Life is worth living.
Thanks for your comments Ragavan. You have raised some valid and pertinent points. I have already thought about them and maybe I will address them in another blog after the elections!
DeleteDear sir,
ReplyDeleteIt's a recap of Indian political history in fast forward from a person who lives through this period.
Although I've not lived in Nehru and Indira Gandhi's times, I would say it's difficult to pass a judgement on their leadership. After all between them, they have ruled the country for over 3 decades, saw through the wars, international pressures internal challenges. Especially Nehru was the PM during a very tough and unstable times. Right after Indian independence and partition. On the world front, major economic powers were coming out of world war 2, colonies were freed, new economic systems were brought in, basically a new world order was emerging.
Many of his decisions could be found to be unfavorable to India. Maybe that's only from hindsight. But we can't totally disregard the merits in the arguments against Nehru. Especially, taking the Kashmir issue to the UN was a monumental blunder overriding the advise of Patel. He should have trusted Patel and Indian army in finishing the task once and for all. After all, they have been successful in other 561 princely states. It was said that Nehru wanted to gift Kashmir to his step brother.
In my view, Nehru's supporters won't agree with anything against him and they worship him. They don't believe that he's also a human being and is just as fallible as anyone else with undeniable frailties.
About Indira Gandhi, the only great thing she did was the timely decision to jump into the Bangladesh liberation war and timely calling of ceasefire without giving in to the temptation of annexing Lahore. But her economic and other political decisions were disastrous to say the least. She was a total control freak and actively sought after and encouraged sycophancy to the extent of being said India is Indira and Indira is India.
People may say they see similarities of such authoritarian leadership with Modi.
But I see Modi similar to Karmaveerar Kamarajar. It's no coincidence that Modi calls himself kaamdar. Simple life, dedicated to the nation, complete distance from family discouraging his family members from being seen anywhere closer to his political circle. They continue to go on with their ordinary lives.
Similarities don't end here. I can go on but will limit with only this. Even the opposition's propaganda against both leaders are strikingly similar. They said Kamarajar was a leader to the big business people and that he was living in a palatial bungalow. They even said he accumulated so much wealth. But the great leader died leaving behind only 2 kadhar jibbas. People who shouted and screamed against him started their lives from "Thiruttu Rail" and ended with satin cloth coffin leaving behind an economic legacy that could last seven generations.
Similar opposition screams could be heard now against Modi also. Hope this time it'll be different thanks much to social media.
Thanks for the detailed feedback Ram. I agree with most of the points raised by you and have replied to some of the similar queries raised by others. Will keep writing!
DeleteHope N. Ram doesn't see this because then he will invite you to write for the The Hindu to revive the falling subscriptions. :-) But seriously mama, i am totally at awe with your writing, no matter what the topic is you just hit it out of the ball park. So proud of you. Please keep writing.
ReplyDeleteHa ha.. Thanks Ramesh for your kind words. Of course, I am not a professional writer but I do enjoy writing!
ReplyDelete